Christenson v. Cudahy Packing Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.
Plaintiff had recovered a money judgment against the defendant, from which the latter appealed. The supreme court modified the judgment and ordered that the defendant recover its costs on appeal. When the remittitur was sent down the defendant, in due course, filed its memorandum of costs in which were included four separate premiums paid on a surety bond to stay execution of that judgment. On motion of the plaintiff these items were ordered stricken from the bill and the appeal is taken from that order.
The right to recover costs is purely statutory. (Turner v. East Side Canal & Irr. Co., 177…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Turner v. East Side Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Sime v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Williams v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Interstate Pipe Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Galbraith v. PaniniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Moss v. Underwriters' Report, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Acree v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Rossa v. D.L. Falk Construction, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2012
- Eisler v. Eastern States Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Evans v. GalardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.