Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Interstate Pipe Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON, C.
Numerous errors are assigned by defendants fn their petition in error, not all of which are necessary to be considered in the disposition of this proceeding. The first, second, and sixth assignments of error present the question of the 'validity of the judgment on the note and of the decree of foreclosure, based on the substituted service on the Secretary of State, and will be considered together as presenting the first proposition.
In the presentation of the legal question involved under these assignments it is first contended by defendants that the provisions of Comp.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Old Wayne Mut. Life Assn. of Indianapolis v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SpratleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Mutual Reserve Fund Life Assn. v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. GentrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Austin v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Spivey & McGill v. NixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Axelrod v. Osage Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Special Indemnity Fund v. PrewittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.