Turner v. East Side Canal & Irrigation Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.
On an appeal by the plaintiffs in this action the part of the judgment appealed from was reversed (168 Cal. 103, [142 Pac. 69]). Upon the going down of the remittitur the plaintiffs filed a memorandum of their costs on appeal. A motion to have costs taxed by the court was made by defendant, and this motion was denied. We have here an appeal by defendant from the order denying this motion.
The appeal presents the question of the right of plaintiffs to recover as costs of the appeal the amounts shown by two items of the memorandum of costs.
The statute in force at the time the decision of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Begbie v. BegbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Cain v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Bank of Woodland v. HiattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Turner v. East Side Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Eaton v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hogan v. IngoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Acree v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Estate of JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Parker v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Kaiser Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.