Legal Opinion
Rossa v. D.L. Falk Construction, Inc.
California Supreme Court
Decided January 23, 2012No. S183523PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.
The filing of a notice of appeal does not stay enforcement of a judgment for the payment of money unless an undertaking is given. (Code Civ. Proc., § 917.1, subd. (a)(1).) The undertaking may be in the form of a bond issued by a surety and filed in the trial court, promising payment of the judgment if it is affirmed, plus any interest accruing on the judgment during the pendency of the appeal and any costs that may be awarded against the appellant. (§ 917.1, subd. (b); see §§ 995.140, 995.150, 995.190, 995.210, 995.320, 995.340.) Insurance companies charge a fee or…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cates Construction, Inc. v. Talbot PartnersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Alan v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Silverbrand v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Beal Bank, SSB v. Arter & Hadden, LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lafferty v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. RaybonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
- Sino Century Development Ltd. v. FarleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Harris v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Andreini & Co. v. MacCorkle Insurance Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.