Legal Opinion

Galbraith v. Panini

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1925No. Docket No. 2764PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from an order taxing costs. Plaintiffs instituted a proceeding to revoke the probate of the will of Annie Gallo, deceased. At the close of plaintiff’s case a nonsuit was granted. On appeal the judgment of nonsuit was reversed. (61 Cal. App. 163 [214 Pac. 496].) For the purposes of that appeal plaintiffs ordered a transcript of testimony from the reporter at an expense of $282.60. Upon the return of the remittitur, in due time, plaintiffs filed their bill of costs, including this item for reporter’s transcript. On defendant’s motion to tax costs this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Galbraith v. PaniniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. Senior v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Turner v. East Side Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Sime v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Blair v. Brownstone Oil & Refining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of BevelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Christenson v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Newberry v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API