Legal Opinion

Bell v. Martin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 1, 1980No. 62PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Justice.

Plaintiff’s petition to this Court presented the question of the trial tribunal’s jurisdiction to hear a Rule 60(b) motion for relief of judgment subsequent to an appeal of the action. At oral argument this question was abandoned by counsel for the plaintiff, and thus will not be addressed by this opinion. Therefore, the sole question presented for review .is the propriety of summary judgment entered by Judge Saunders against the defendant on August 28, 1978.

Under G.S. 1A-1 Rule 56(c), summary judgment is appropriate if the moving party can show by the use of pleadings,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Pitts v. Village Inn Pizza, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Whaley v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  4. North American Acceptance Corp. v. SamuelsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Spartan Leasing Inc. v. PollardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Feibus & Co., Inc. v. Godley Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Peebles v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. NCCS Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. Lloyd v. Carnation Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API