Legal Opinion

Peebles v. Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 4, 1981No. 13PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff first takes the position that under Chapter 1 A-l of the General Statutes a clerk of the superior court has authority to enter a default even though an answer is on file prior to the request for entry of default. Defendant on the other hand argues that the established practice in North Carolina does not permit a clerk to enter a default when an answer is on file, and that the adoption of Chapter 1 A-l does not affect the established rule. He relies on a line of cases represented by Bailey v. Davis, 231 N.C. 86, 55 S.E. 2d 919 (1949). In Bailey the clerk of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bell v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Carolina-Tennessee Power Co. v. Hiawassee River Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  3. Bailey v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Crotts v. Camel Pawn Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Power Co. v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. North Carolina National Bank v. Virginia Carolina BuildersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Granville Medical Center v. TiptonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. RC ASSOCIATES v. Regency Ventures, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Cheek v. PooleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  5. Stone v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API