North American Acceptance Corp. v. Samuels
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MALLARD, Chief Judge.
Neither appellant nor appellee filed brief within the time prescribed by the rules. However, both have filed briefs and we therefore consider the case.
The parties stipulated that “for purposes of this record of appeal it shall not be necessary to set out the Summons.” The certificate of service of the summons and complaint is not in the record. However, in the “Entry of Default Judgment” and in defendant’s brief, it is asserted that the summons and complaint were served on the defendant on 15 October 1970. We assume, therefore, that the summons and complaint were lawfully…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Whaley v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Brady v. Town of Chapel HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
3Cited by28 opinions
- Spartan Leasing Inc. v. PollardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Bell v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Peebles v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Howell Ex Rel. Howell v. HaliburtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Webb v. JamesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.