Legal Opinion
Lloyd v. Carnation Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided April 5, 1983No. 8215SC391PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRASWELL, Judge.
The focal point of the facts concerns a verbal contract of 1967 vintage through which the plaintiff allegedly became an exclusive territorial distributor of bull semen for Carnation Company. It is crucial, given the history of the case, that we examine procedure before substance in our analysis.
When the complaint was filed on 18 April 1979, there were three defendants: Carnation Company, Gary Willier and Warren Manuel. The complaint contains seven counts for relief. The first five counts are designated as against defendant Carnation only: (1) Unfair Trade Practice, (2)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Home Insurance v. DickSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Pipeliners Local Union No. 798, Tulsa, Oklahoma, and A. Leroy Jones v. Fred H. EllerdCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- North Carolina National Bank v. GillespieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Charnock v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Sides v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- ITCO Corp. v. Michelin Tire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- United Virginia Bank v. Air-Lift Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Harco National Insurance v. Grant Thornton LLPCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Itco Corporation v. Michelin Tire Corporation, Commercial Division, and State of North Carolina, Amicus Curiae. Itco Corporation v. Michelin Tire Corporation, Commercial DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.