First National Bank v. Holmes
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Washtenaw; Sample (George W.), J. Assumpsit by the First National Bank of Ann Arbor against Harmon S. Holmes and another on a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This case has been brought to this court *43by the defendants on writ of error to. review a judgment in the court below, for the plaintiff upon a promissory note made by the defendants, in the words and figures following:
“$2,290.00 Ann Arbor, Mich. Aug. 25, 1917.
“One year after date I promise to pay to the order of the First National Bank of Ann Arbor twenty-two hundred and ninety dollars, at the First National Bank of Ann Arbor. Value received with interest at six per cent, after date, payable semi-annually.
“A. F. Freeman,
“H. S. Holmes.”
There are 63 assignments of error. The original brief of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Leo Austrian & Co. v. SpringerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Kulenkamp v. GroffMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Bank v. Ohio Valley Furniture Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
- Phelps v. AbbottMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Mason v. PartrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hewett Grocery Co. v. Biddle Purchasing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Mossman v. Millenbach Motor SalesMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Garey v. Kelvinator Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Jenks v. County of InghamMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Cechanowicz v. Highland Park State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.