Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Holmes

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1921No. Docket No. 62PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Washtenaw; Sample (George W.), J. Assumpsit by the First National Bank of Ann Arbor against Harmon S. Holmes and another on a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This case has been brought to this court *43by the defendants on writ of error to. review a judgment in the court below, for the plaintiff upon a promissory note made by the defendants, in the words and figures following:

“$2,290.00 Ann Arbor, Mich. Aug. 25, 1917.
“One year after date I promise to pay to the order of the First National Bank of Ann Arbor twenty-two hundred and ninety dollars, at the First National Bank of Ann Arbor. Value received with interest at six per cent, after date, payable semi-annually.
“A. F. Freeman,
“H. S. Holmes.”

There are 63 assignments of error. The original brief of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Leo Austrian & Co. v. SpringerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Kulenkamp v. GroffMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Bank v. Ohio Valley Furniture Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Phelps v. AbbottMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Mason v. PartrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hewett Grocery Co. v. Biddle Purchasing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Mossman v. Millenbach Motor SalesMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Garey v. Kelvinator Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Jenks v. County of InghamMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Cechanowicz v. Highland Park State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API