Legal Opinion

Mossman v. Millenbach Motor Sales

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1938No. Docket No. 138, Calendar No. 39,517PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.

Plaintiff is the owner of an automobile rental company. In October of 1934, intending to purchase a truck, he called the office of defendant, a motor sales corporation. The telephone switchboard operator of defendant company connected plaintiff with the used car lot of defendant, and he thereupon had a conversation with Herbert Stout, one of defendant’s salesmen. Thereafter plaintiff proceeded to defendant’s used car lot where he talked to one Smith, an agent of defendant, who was the only person at the lot and appeared to be in charge. As a result of his conversation, he purchased a Ford…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Grinnell v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. MoonMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Kerns v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Marx v. KingMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Farneth v. Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. K & T Enterprises, Inc., D/B/A Dairy Queen of Blissfield, and Tahani Khoury v. Zurich Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Altobelli v. HartmannMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Allstate Insurance v. SnarskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Florence Cement Co. v. VettrainoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Michael v. KircherMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API