Mason v. Partrick
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon. (Dickerman, J.) Argued April 12, 1894. Decided June 2, 1894. Replevin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is an action of replevin. In June, 1891, the parties entered into a written contract, which recited that the plaintiff had agreed to advance $1,000 to defendant for the purpose of establishing a milk, dairy, and commission business, to be known as the “ Muskegon Creamery,” and to be operated by and under the name of Henry L. Partrick. The defendant, in consideration of this advance, agreed to devote his entire time to 'the management and operation of the business, and to assign and set over to plaintiff a certain land contract as security, and agreed to consult with the plaintiff…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Erickson v. DrazkowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by13 opinions
- Chaperon v. Portland Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902
- People v. KongealMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- C. O. G. Railroad Co. v. DeperadeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Norman B. Lawton and Leonard B. Lawton v. Dorothy K. StrongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
- Eberts v. Detroit, Mt. Clemens & Marine City RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.