Legal Opinion

Garey v. Kelvinator Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1937No. Docket No. 85, Calendar No. 39,137PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtishnell, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff upon a verdict by a jury for $21,975 on a claim of $35,000 for legal services rendered to Nizer Corporation, a Maryland corporation. All the liabilities of Nizer, according to plaintiff’s declaration, were assumed by Kelvinator Corporation of Michigan, then known as Electric Refrigeration Corporation, when it acquired the assets of Nizer.

Four questions are involved:

1. If he be a creditor of the Maryland corporation, can plaintiff maintain an action at law against the Michigan corporation under the terms of a certain written…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Converse v. BlumrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Grenell v. Detroit Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Beebe v. KnappMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Ten Eyck v. Pontiac, Oxford & Port Austin RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Leo Austrian & Co. v. SpringerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kalamazoo Yellow Cab Co. v. Kalamazoo Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Trans-American Freight Lines, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Mossman v. Millenbach Motor SalesMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Aimonetto v. Rapid Gas, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Kitchen v. Boyd (In Re Newpower)District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API