Legal Opinion

Cechanowicz v. Highland Park State Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1923No. Docket No. 133PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

It is the claim of the plaintiff, a native of Russia but a naturalized American citizen, a customer of defendant, that he was approached by Mr. Gruenberg, a teller of defendant working in the *39foreign exchange department, with the suggestion that money could be made by the purchase of Russian rubles and depositing them in a Russian bank. This was in October, 1917, and rubles were worth 16 cents, having then fallen from 52 cents to that figure. Plaintiff was somewhat dubious about the situation in Russia but claims that Mr. Gruenberg assured him that the money could be sent and that the book…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Atlantic Communication Co. v. ZimmermannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  2. United States v. PowersDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1921
  3. First National Bank v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Plankinton Packing Co. v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Coal District Power Co. v. Katy Coal Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Romanuick v. Highland Park State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Kolodig v. Highland Park State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Skuratowicz v. Highland Park State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Vasu v. People's State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API