Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 14, 1959No. 145-56PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge
This case, brought by some 117 firefighters at the Tinker Air Force Base at Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, involves their right to compensation for the time they were required to spend on the employer’s premises, subject to call, but during which they were permitted to eat or sleep.
The case arises under the Federal Employees Pay Act of 1945 (59 Stat. 295), and,, for a portion of the period, under the amendment thereof on September 1,1954, designated the Premium Pay Act (68 Stat. 1111; 5 U. S. C. 926).
1. Section 201 of the Federal Employees Pay Act of 1945 reads, in part, as follows:
Section 201.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bell v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- Bowers v. Remington Rand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- Ahearn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Baylor v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Edward William Rapp v. The United States. Ward Roland Hawkins v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Agner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Bantom v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Ayres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.