Legal Opinion
Ahearn v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 7, 1958No. 332-55PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge
Plaintiffs sue for overtime and night differential pay-alleged to be due them for services as firefighters at the United States Naval Base, Newport, Rhode Island. Their claims are based upon sections 201 and 301 of the Federal Employees Pay Act of 1945, as amended, 59 Stat. 295. The claims of plaintiffs herein, one hundred and eleven in number, except for travel pay, are similar, in both law and fact, to those of other firefighters recently considered by this court in Avary, et al. v. United States, 141 C. Cls. 577, and Collins v. United States, 141 C. Cls. 573.
The trial herein was limited by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Poggas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- Bulot v. Freeport Sulphur Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1942
- Dehanitz v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Carruth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Bobo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Albright v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Riggs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Bobo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.