Legal Opinion

Bantom v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 13, 1964No. 481-61PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

This case was referred pursuant to Buie 45 to Herbert N. Maletz, a trial commissioner of this court, with directions to make findings of fact and recommendation for conclusions of law. The commissioner has done so in a report filed May 21, 1963. Plaintiffs filed exceptions to the commissioner’s report and a brief. Defendant filed a notice of election to submit on the commissioner’s report without a brief. The case was submitted to the court on oral argument of counsel. Since the court is in agreement with the findings and recommendation of the trial commissioner, as hereinafter…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Albright v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  4. Ahearn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  5. Farley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Baylor v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  2. Riggs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  3. Prendergast v. City of TempeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. Ayres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  5. Bilello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API