Legal Opinion
Blake v. Mosher
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 30, 1936No. Civ. No. 5497PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
Action begun for money had and received. Defendant had judgment and the plaintiff appeals. The complaint in this action (omitting the title and the prayer) contains three paragraphs, as follows:
“I.
“That within two years last past, in the County of Yolo, State of California, defendant above named became indebted to plaintiff above named in the sum of Fifteen Hundred Dollars ($1,500.00) on account of moneys had and received by said defendant for the use, and for the benefit of said plaintiff.
“II.
“That plaintiff has demanded the payment of said Fifteen Hundred Dollars ($1,500.00) but defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Okmulgee v. MatlockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Reese v. Bald Mountain Consolidated Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Blank v. RodgersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Damerel v. North American Bond & Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Anderson v. BergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gould v. CallanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Colorado Corp., Ltd. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Canavan v. College of Osteopathic Physicians & SurgeonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Deering-Milliken & Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Modern-Aire of Hollywood, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Mason v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.