Deering-Milliken & Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Modern-Aire of Hollywood, Inc., a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.
This is an action on alleged contract claimed to have been entered into between Modern-Aire of Hollywood, Inc., plaintiff, and Deering-Milliken & Co., Inc., defendant. The complaint alleges the formation and breach by Deering-Milliken of a contract with plaintiff for the purchase and sale of 126,000 yards of rayon goods. The supposed agreement concerned material to be used by Modern-Aire in filling another engagement entered into by that company with the United States. The cause was tried by a judge sitting without a jury. Judgment was for plaintiff Modern-Aire…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Breckinridge v. CrockerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Blake v. MosherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Jules Levy & Bro. v. A. Mautz & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Toms v. HellmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
3Cited by15 opinions
- Day v. a & G Construction Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Waterman Steamship Corporation v. Gay Cottons, United States of America and Shalom Baby WearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Graham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Brown v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- Ralston-Purina Company, a Corporation v. John P. Bertie and L. Irene Bertie, Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.