Legal Opinion

Deering-Milliken & Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Modern-Aire of Hollywood, Inc., a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 20, 1956No. 19-35469PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.

This is an action on alleged contract claimed to have been entered into between Modern-Aire of Hollywood, Inc., plaintiff, and Deering-Milliken & Co., Inc., defendant. The complaint alleges the formation and breach by Deering-Milliken of a contract with plaintiff for the purchase and sale of 126,000 yards of rayon goods. The supposed agreement concerned material to be used by Modern-Aire in filling another engagement entered into by that company with the United States. The cause was tried by a judge sitting without a jury. Judgment was for plaintiff Modern-Aire…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Breckinridge v. CrockerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Blake v. MosherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Jules Levy & Bro. v. A. Mautz & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Toms v. HellmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Day v. a & G Construction Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Waterman Steamship Corporation v. Gay Cottons, United States of America and Shalom Baby WearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. Graham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  4. Brown v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960
  5. Ralston-Purina Company, a Corporation v. John P. Bertie and L. Irene Bertie, Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API