Legal Opinion

Damerel v. North American Bond & Mortgage Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 14, 1933No. Docket No. 8558PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

This appeal is taken from a single judgment entered in three consolidated actions, which judgment is against the plaintiff and in favor of defendant in each case. The plaintiff Laura Belle Damerel instituted two actions, one for money had and received and the other in claim and delivery, whereby she sought recovery of a nonnegotiable note in exchange by her for capital stock of defendant corporation. The action of Olivia McClain was for money had and received.

Practically the same issues are presented in the three cases. We will take first the case of Olivia McClain. O'n or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Tatterson v. KehrleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. MacDonald v. Reich & Lievre, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Kales v. HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. De Garmo v. Petitfils ConfiserieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Talbot v. Fresno-Pacific Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Blake v. MosherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Vavricka v. Mid-Continent-Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API