Legal Opinion

Gould v. Callan

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 3, 1954No. Civ. 20085PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment denying him a decree of specific performance of a written contract for the conveyance of real property. The trial court held that the contract, evidenced by escrow instructions, is too uncertain and indefinite to constitute an enforceable or binding agreement.

The contract was entered into on June 16, 1952. Plaintiff was the purported buyer; defendant Callan the purported seller. The property consisted of four lots in Los Angeles on which were a market, a parking lot, and a billboard. The purchase price was $65,000. No cash deposit was required or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Buckmaster v. BertramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Klein v. MarkarianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Burnett v. KullakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Colorado Corp., Ltd. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Ridgway v. ChaseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Magna Development Co. v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Roberts v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. House v. LalaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. S. Jon Kreedman v. MEYERS BROS. PARKING-WESTERNCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. MCB LTD. v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API