Legal Opinion

Reese v. Bald Mountain Consolidated Gold Mining Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1901No. Sac. No. 747PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

This action was brought to recover an amount claimed as wages for labor performed in mines in the lands of appellant corporation, and to have the said amount declared to be a lien upon the mining lands described in the complaint. Findings were filed, and judgment ordered for plaintiffs. This appeal is from the judgment, upon the judgment roll and a bill of exceptions. The complaint alleges that the labor performed was that of miners in and upon the mines of the corporation, and that the contracts for said labor were made with defendant Pugh. There is no dispute as to the facts, that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spect v. SpectCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Williams v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n of Balt.California Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Spinney v. GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Jurgenson v. DillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Ayers v. Green Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Williams v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. Vega-HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Blake v. MosherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Pioneer Mining Co. v. DelamotteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
  5. Higgins v. Carlotta Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API