Arm v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
In this proceeding, we consider the recommendation of the Review Department of the State Bar Court (review department) that petitioner Fred H. Arm, who was admitted to the practice of law in Califor*768nia on January 9, 1972, be disbarred. The recommendation is based on conclusions that petitioner, who has been the subject of three prior disciplinary proceedings, violated his duties as an attorney in two additional instances: First, during a juvenile court proceeding he misled the court by failing to disclose he was about to be suspended from the practice of law for a 60-day…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Segretti v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Clark v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Marsh v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Doyle v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Edwards v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re NaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Brockway v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.