Legal Opinion

In Re Naney

California Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1990No. S010242PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

We review the recommendation of the State Bar Court Review Department (review department) that petitioner David G. Naney be disbarred from the practice of law in this state. This recommendation is based on petitioner’s conviction of three misdemeanor counts (see Pen. Code, § 17, subd. (b)(4)) of grand theft (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. 1) for misappropriation of entrusted funds, and on petitioner’s subsequent conduct in misrepresenting his academic qualifications and failing to disclose his interim suspension to a prospective employer.

The State Bar’s Standards for Attorney…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Greenbaum v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Smith v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Lawhorn v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. In Re DemergianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. In Re LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Edwards v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Grim v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Baca v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API