Legal Opinion
Ackers v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 9, 1940No. Civ. 12571PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWood, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff seeks by this action to recover a judgment against the City of Los Angeles for injuries which she suffered when she fell upon a defective sidewalk. The demurrer of defendant city to the second amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend and the appeal is taken from the resulting judgment.
The question presented for determination is whether paragraph IV of the second amended complaint sets forth facts sufficient to attach liability to the city. The allegations in this paragraph are as follows: ‘ ‘ That for a long time prior to the 26th day of November, 1938, a portion of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Norton v. City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Whiting v. City of National CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Sandstoe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Rafferty v. City of MarysvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Hook v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Palmer v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Barrett v. City of ClaremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Balkwill v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Jones v. City of South San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Bady v. DetwilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.