Legal Opinion

Moore v. Fellner

California Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1958No. L. A. 24895PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

From a judgment for $12,825 in plaintiff’s favor in his action to recover the reasonable value of services rendered by him as an attorney, both plaintiff and defendants *334appeal. Plaintiff contends that the award is inadequate, and defendants, claiming breach of contract by plaintiff,1 urge that judgment should have been in their favor. We have concluded that plaintiff has established a prevailing right, and that the judgment should be reversed and the value of the services redetermined.

The contract between the parties is evidenced by writings in the form of letters. These, and other writings…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Radar v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Jones v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Oliver v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Salopek v. SchoemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Kim v. Comptroller of TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Chambliss, Bahner and Crawford v. LutherCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
  3. Sohn v. BrockingtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Estate of FalcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Edwards v. Container Kraft Carton & Paper Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API