Salopek v. Schoemann
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
The plaintiff, as assignee of J. Maxwell Peyser, an attorney, commenced this action to foreclose a lien asserted under the written agreement of the defendant Robert Schoemann to pay for legal services. The attorney was discharged by his client on the same day the agreement was signed. The court decreed the enforcement of the lien to the extent of the reasonable value of the services performed to the time of discharge. On appeal by the plaintiff it is contended that the attorney was entitled to the enforcement of the lien to the full amount of the contract.
With one exception the correctness of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. KinslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Gage v. AtwaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Bartlett v. Odd FelLows' Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Todd v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- General Dynamics Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Isrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Weiss v. MarcusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Plaza Shoe Store, Inc. v. Hermel, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1982
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.