Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Container Kraft Carton & Paper Supply Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 2, 1958No. Civ. 22291PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Appeal from judgment for damages for malicious prosecution of an injunction action.

Appellants challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings of want of probable cause and malice; also argue that this action was prematurely brought and that the award of damages is not supported by proof of certainty of loss to plaintiff.

Plaintiff Edwards was employed as salesman for defendant Container Kraft Carton and Paper Supply Company (hereinafter designated as Container) for about five years before he opened his own competitive business. Container is a jobber engaged in selling…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Continental Car-Na-Var Corp. v. MoseleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Asevado v. OrrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. McConnell v. Corona City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1906

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Brandon & Tibbs v. George Kevorkian Accountancy Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Gerwin v. Southeastern California Ass'n of Seventh Day AdventistsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Atkin, Wright & Miles, CharteredUtah Supreme Court · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API