Legal Opinion

Radar v. Rogers

California Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1957No. L. A. 24421PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered after a demurrer to their second amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend. Plaintiff Radar was allegedly injured and the property of plaintiffs Walter J. Henry and Catherine Henry damaged by the negligence of George Rogers, since deceased. The question is whether the action is barred by the following provision of section 714 of the Probate Code: “When a claim is rejected either by the executor or administrator . . . written notice of such rejection shall be given . . . to the holder of the claim or to the person filing or presenting it,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cal. Farm & Fruit Co. v. Schiappa-PietraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Verbeck v. ClymerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Bemmerly v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Hentsch v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Lewis v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Petersen v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Kim v. Comptroller of TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Satterfield v. GarmireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API