Legal Opinion

Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1957No. L. A. 24193PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

This is plaintiff’s second appeal in an action based upon a policy of “comprehensive” personal liability insurance issued to plaintiff by defendant insurance company. This litigation, as well as an earlier related action in the municipal court, which included an appeal to the appellate department of the superior court, has been occasioned by defendant company’s wrongful refusal to either defend plaintiff in the prior (municipal court) action or to discharge the judgment entered against him in such prior action and reimburse him for his costs and attorney’s fees incurred in defending that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Brown v. Guarantee InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Sentinel Insurance Co. v. First Insurance Co. of Hawai'i, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Gribaldo, Jacobs, Jones & Associates v. Agrippina Versicherunges A. G.California Supreme Court · 1970

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API