Rule v. Jones

There are a number of close questions involved on this appeal. The first involves the jury findings of negligence and their apportionment of it. Kramer contends that there is no credible evidence to sustain the jury’s finding that he was causally negligent and that the causal negligence of Mrs. Jones was equal to or greater than his. Mrs. Jones claims that there is no credible evidence to support the finding that she was negligent. These contentions cannot be sustained in view of the following evidence which the jury could and evidently did consider credible.

The road on which the accident…