Legal Opinion

Wilcott v. Ley

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

It is the contention of 'the appellant that the trial court was in error in imputing to plaintiff the negligence of his wife in operating the car. Appellant relies principally upon the case of Brubaker v. Iowa County, 174 Wis. 574, 183 N. W. 690, as sustaining.his contention. In this case plaintiff, her husband, and her sister were driving from Oshkosh to Sioux City, where she and her husband intended to reside. They were traveling in the husband’s automobile and he was driving'. The injuries were the result of a defect in the highway, which the jury found was not in a reasonably safe…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Prideaux v. City of Mineral PointWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Brubaker v. Iowa CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Reiter v. GroberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Zeidler v. GoelzerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Angel v. McCleanTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Fox v. KaminskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Pearson v. ErbNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Rule v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Bartek v. Glasers Provisions Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API