Legal Opinion

Knipfer v. Shaw

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1933PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed January 10, 1933 :

Nelson, J.

Numerous errors are assigned by defendants, but in the view we take of this controversy only two require consideration. A third assignment of error, however, will be discussed, to the end that trial courts may clearly appreciate the importance of having the reporter available *619during the deliberations of the jury so that a request by the jury for the reading of testimony may be complied with.

The two contentions to be considered are as follows :

I. Defendant Knipfer contends that under the undisputed evidence it should be held as a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Allyn v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Sommerfield v. FluryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Brubaker v. Iowa CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Reiter v. GroberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Carpenter v. ShepardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Walker v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. McConville v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Roberts v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  4. Warner v. MarkoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  5. Bohnsack v. DriftmierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API