Knipfer v. Shaw
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed January 10, 1933 :
Nelson, J.
Numerous errors are assigned by defendants, but in the view we take of this controversy only two require consideration. A third assignment of error, however, will be discussed, to the end that trial courts may clearly appreciate the importance of having the reporter available *619during the deliberations of the jury so that a request by the jury for the reading of testimony may be complied with.
The two contentions to be considered are as follows :
I. Defendant Knipfer contends that under the undisputed evidence it should be held as a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Allyn v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Sommerfield v. FluryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Brubaker v. Iowa CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Reiter v. GroberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Carpenter v. ShepardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Walker v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- McConville v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Roberts v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Warner v. MarkoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- Bohnsack v. DriftmierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.