Legal Opinion

Monsos v. Euler

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1934PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

On March 18, 1932, pursuant to previous arrangements, plaintiff came by rail from her home at Black River Falls to the city of Baraboo, where she met the defendant. Plaintiff and defendant had planned to drive to Milwaukee, and then to visit plaintiff’s • relatives in Port Washington. When they left Baraboo about 4 o’clock in the afternoon it was raining, sleeting, and freezing. - The windshield was obstructed by ice, and the windshield wiper was ineffective to remove this. In order to improve the conditions of visibility through the'windshield, defendant lighted two candles and placed them…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cleary v. EckartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Knipfer v. ShawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Olson v. HermansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Young v. Nunn, Bush & Weldon Shoe Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Eisenhut v. EisenhutWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Olson v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Culver v. WebbWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Ianni v. Grain Dealers Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Pecor v. Home Indemnity Co. of New YorkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Schulz v. St. Mary's HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API