Legal Opinion

Arnold Pontiac-GMC, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 21, 1988No. Civ. A. 82-1861PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MENCER, District Judge.

In this action, Arnold Pontiac-GMC, Inc. alleges that General Motors Corporation violated section one of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. Both parties have filed motions for summary judgment which are presently before this court.

Facts

For purposes of these cross-motions, the relevant facts can be summarized briefly. Arnold Pontiac-GMC, Inc. (Arnold Pontiac) applied to General Motors Corporation (GMC) for a Buick dealership. GMC took several actions potentially indicating that it was going to award the dealership to Arnold Pontiac, such as leaving an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. National Society of Professional Engineers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  4. Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Business Electronics Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Smolsky v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Glanzman v. Metropolitan Management Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Morgan v. Havir Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Simon v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
  5. Brown v. SmytheDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API