Business Electronics Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia
Petitioner Business Electronics Corporation seeks review of a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the *720Fifth Circuit holding that a vertical restraint is per se illegal under § 1 of the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209, as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 1, only if there is an express or implied agreement to set resale prices at some level. 780 F. 2d 1212, 1215-1218 (1986). We granted certiorari, 482 U. S. 912 (1987), to resolve a conflict in the Courts of Appeals regarding the proper dividing line between the rule that vertical price restraints are illegal per se and the rule that vertical…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by520 opinions
- In Re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- State Oil Co. v. KhanSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Greebel v. FTP Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
515 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.