Legal Opinion

Business Electronics Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 2, 1988No. 85-1910PublishedCited by 520 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia

Petitioner Business Electronics Corporation seeks review of a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the *720Fifth Circuit holding that a vertical restraint is per se illegal under § 1 of the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209, as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 1, only if there is an express or implied agreement to set resale prices at some level. 780 F. 2d 1212, 1215-1218 (1986). We granted certiorari, 482 U. S. 912 (1987), to resolve a conflict in the Courts of Appeals regarding the proper dividing line between the rule that vertical price restraints are illegal per se and the rule that vertical…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by520 opinions

  1. In Re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  2. State Oil Co. v. KhanSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Greebel v. FTP Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

515 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API