Legal Opinion
Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 2, 1976No. 75-1333PublishedCited by 841 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order in a diversity case granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment.1 The original plaintiffs were Florence L. Goodman and her husband, Robert J. Goodman. While the action was pending Florence Goodman died, and Robert Goodman, as executor of her estate, was substituted as the real party in interest pursuant to Rule 17(a), Fed.R. Civ.P. The defendant is Mead Johnson & Company, the manufacturer of the estrogen compound Oracon, which Florence Goodman used from April 4 through June 19, 1967 and which plaintiff alleges…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Simler v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by841 opinions
- Kost v. KozakiewiczCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Groman v. Township Of ManalapanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Carol Aman Jeanette Johnson v. Cort Furniture Rental CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Orsatti v. New Jersey State PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Kost v. KozakiewiczCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
836 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.