Legal Opinion

Glanzman v. Metropolitan Management Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 5, 2003No. 2:02-cv-07195PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOYNER, District Judge.

This employment discrimination case is now before the Court for resolution of the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons which follow, the motion is granted.

Factual Background

By this lawsuit, Plaintiff Julia Glanzman alleges that she was terminated from her position as the property manager at the Doylestown Meadows apartment complex in Doylestown, Pennsylvania on October 2, 2001 because of her age. At the time she was separated from her employment, Ms. Glanzman was 64 years old and had worked for Metropolitan Management Corp. at…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Howell v. Millersville Univ. of Pa.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Cobetto v. Wyeth PharmaceuticalsDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Jajua v. MinistriesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Howe v. Creditors Interchange Receivables Management, LLC (In Re Howe)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Martin v. ALUMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API