Legal Opinion
Smolsky v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 12, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-4634PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HUTTON, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, plaintiff’s response and defendant’s reply. For the following reasons defendant’s motion is DENIED.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The complaint in this case was filed on July 16, 1990 and contains two counts. One count alleges negligent infliction of emotional distress under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (hereinafter “FELA”) and the other alleges sexual discrimination/hostile work environment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (hereinafter Title VII). The…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Andrews v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Radtke v. EverettMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Earwood v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1993
- Revis v. Slocomb Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1993
- James E. Gottshall v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Gharzouzi v. Northwestern Human Services of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.