Legal Opinion

Broome Construction, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 20, 1974No. 375-72PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeNNEtt, Judge

This contract dispute was submitted to the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. The case has been well briefed and all material facts essential to determination of the issues of liability are stipulated. Two claims are made. Plaintiff seeks a Wunderlich Act1 review of a decision of the Department of Agriculture Board of Contract Appeals 2 on its remission of liquidated damages claim and seeks breach of contract damages in the sum of $18,331.34 for delay alleged to have been the fault of defendant. The board denied the latter claim for lack of jurisdiction and rejected the claim for an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Commerce International Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  4. United States v. United Engineering & Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. United States v. Howard P. Foley Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Blinderman Construction Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  2. G.M. Shupe, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  3. Neal & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  4. SIPCO Services & Marine Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  5. Blinderman Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API