Legal Opinion

State v. Meharry

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 28, 2005No. CFH030171; A124222PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

The state appeals a pretrial order suppressing evidence obtained in a warrantless search of an automobile, arguing that the search fell within one of three exceptions to the warrant requirement: (1) search incident to arrest; (2) the “automobile exception”; or (3) probable cause plus exigent circumstances. We review the trial court’s legal conclusions for errors of law, and we are bound by its factual findings if there is sufficient evidence in the record to support them. State v. Ehly, 317 Or 66, 75, 854 P2d 421 (1993). We affirm for the reasons that follow.

On November 8,2002, the Umatilla…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. ChinnOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State v. KockOregon Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MeharryOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. Kurokawa-LasciakOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. McCarthyOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State v. NewportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. State v. WigginsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API