Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Loydon

California Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1912No. L.A. No. 3116PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff - from a judgment given by the trial court in favor of defendant on the pleadings, the -motion for such judgment being based on the ground, among others, that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The action was instituted on April 10, 1909, to recover the sum of $455; The complaint showed substantially the following facts: On November 14, 1908, plaintiff’s testator leased to defendant by an instrument in writing certain real property for the term of one year, commencing November 15, 1908, and ending November 14, 1909, in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bradbury v. HigginsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Nicholes v. SwiftSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. San Francisco Law & Collection Co. v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Tatum v. AckermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. De Hart v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Treff v. GulkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Brix v. Peoples Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Phillips-Hollman, Inc. v. Peerless Stages, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Lee v. DeForestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API