Legal Opinion
Lee v. DeForest
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 19, 1937No. Civ. 11318PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
From a summary judgment that was rendered against him under section 437c of the Code of Civil Procedure, which provides that when an answer is filed in an action to recover upon a debt or upon a liquidated demand, upon motion of the plaintiff, supported by affidavit, such answer may be stricken out and judgment may be entered in the discretion-of the court, unless the defendant shall show by affidavit “such facts as may be deemed by the judge hearing the motion sufficient to entitle him to defend”, defendant has appealed to this court.
By the terms of a lease entered into between…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mann v. . Munch BreweryNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- McCready v. . LindenbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Hermitage Co. v. LevineNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Kottler v. New York Bargain House, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Bradbury v. HigginsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- William Waggoner v. Robert Lee DallaireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Tsemetzin v. Coast Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Conway v. Bughouse, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- Tillson v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.