Legal Opinion

Tatum v. Ackerman

California Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1905No. S.F. No. 2991PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This action was brought to recover $1,581.98 and interest, in which sum, it was alleged in the complaint, the defendant “became and was indebted to plaintiffs . . . for and on account of goods, wares, and merchandise sold and delivered by plaintiffs to defendant.” The allegations of the complaint were specifically denied by the answer, and, in addition, a breach of warranty was alleged,— viz., that an engine, which was one of the articles sold, failed to satisfy the plaintiffs’ warranty,—and thereupon the defendant had rescinded the purchase and had attempted to return the engine to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Heilbronn v. . HerzogNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Keller v. . StrasburgerNew York Court of Appeals · 1882

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hulen v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Bradbury v. HigginsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Oliver v. LoydonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Ætna Life Ins. v. GeherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  5. Irwin v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API