Legal Opinion

Brix v. Peoples Mutual Life Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1935No. S. F. 15134PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This action was brought to recover on an accident insurance policy issued by the defendant in favor of the plaintiff. The policy provided that in case the insured was accidentally injured and such injury “shall wholly and continuously disable the Insured from performing any and every kind of duty pertaining to his occupation for one day or more, so long as the Insured lives and suffers total loss of time, the Company will pay a monthly indemnity at the rate of One Hundred ($100) Dollars”. The complaint is in two counts. The first count contains proper and sufficient allegations showing the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Merchants Heat & Light Co. v. J. B. Clow & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Bradbury v. HigginsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Newman v. BurwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. New York Life Insurance v. EnglishTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Robinson v. Exempt Fire Co.California Supreme Court · 1894

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. ViglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Caminetti v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Gardenswartz v. Equitable Etc. Soc.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Erreca v. Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API