San Francisco Law & Collection Co. v. State
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Joseph W. Hughes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
ANGELLOTTI, J.—
This is a motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment entered against defendant in the superior court of Sacramento County, for the sum of $8,885. The action was brought under the provisions of the act of March 23, 1901, (Stats. 1901, p. 646,) author sing suits against the state on claims arising under the act fixing a bounty on coyote scalps, approved March 31, 1891. The motion to dismiss the appeal is based on several grounds, which will be separately considered.
1. It is urged that the appellant has failed to serve or file a transcript on appeal within the time prescribed by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. RhoadesNevada Supreme Court · 1871
- Ex parte MacdonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Noonan v. NunanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Robinson v. Templar Lodge No. 17California Supreme Court · 1896
- Hewes v. Carville Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bradbury v. HigginsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Maurice L. Bein, Inc. v. Housing Authority of City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Union Trust Co. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Niles v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Oliver v. LoydonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.