Legal Opinion

Treff v. Gulko

California Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 11089PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The petition for a transfer of this cause to this court was granted for the reason that, in view of the authorities cited in said petition, we were of the opinion at the time that further consideration should he given to certain questions discussed and decided in the opinion of the appellate court. It was held in said decision that the action having been instituted prior to the expiration of the original lease was prematurely brought, citing Phillips-Hollman, Inc., v. Peerless Stages, Inc., 210 Cal. 253 [291 Pac. 178]. Plaintiff seeks to differentiate that case and kindred cases relied upon…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hermitage Co. v. LevineNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Kottler v. New York Bargain House, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Bonetti v. TreatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Bradbury v. HigginsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Phillips-Hollman, Inc. v. Peerless Stages, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. De Hart v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Kulawitz v. Pacific Woodenware & Paper Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Ellingson v. Walsh, O'Connor & BarnesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API