Legal Opinion
Morris v. Congdon
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 19, 2004No. AC 24109PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
In this mandamus action, the plaintiffs, Bruce Morris and George Kleeman, appeal from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the defendants, the board of selectmen (board) of the town of Preston and its three members,1 denying the plaintiffs’ request for an order to compel the defendants to call a town meeting. The plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly determined that their application to the board presented an improper purpose for a town meeting. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following procedural history and factual background are relevant to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Home Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- City of Hartford v. American Arbitration Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- City of Groton v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- State ex rel. Reiley v. ChatfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Billboards Divinity, LLC v. Commissioner of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Gomes v. Massachusetts Bay InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Morris v. CongdonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Hartmann v. Gulf View Estates Homeowners Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Weldy v. NORTHBROOK CONDOMINIUM ASS'N, INC.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.