Legal Opinion

Morris v. Congdon

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 28, 2006No. SC 17336PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SULLIVAN, C. J.

The plaintiff, Bruce Morris, a resident of the town of Preston (town), appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court, which affirmed the judgment of the trial court rendering summary judgment in favor of the defendants, the board of selectmen of the town (board) and its individual members. We granted certification to appeal limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendants were not required to warn a special town meeting in accordance with the plaintiffs’ petition for a writ of mandamus?” Morris v. Congdon, 272 Conn. 913,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. LovettSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Hanks v. Powder Ridge Restaurant Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. State v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Doe v. Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. Hogan v. Department of Children & FamiliesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. Watrous v. Town of PrestonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
  4. Billboards Divinity, LLC v. Commissioner of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  5. Lewis v. Town of WaterfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API