Legal Opinion

Gomes v. Massachusetts Bay Insurance

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 15, 2005No. AC 24409PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

The plaintiff, John A. Gomes, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that he was not entitled to coverage under the underinsured motorist policy endorsement issued by the defendant. Specifically, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) construed General Statutes § 38a-336 (f) as limiting underinsured motorist coverage to those employees of a named insured who are injured while “occupying” a covered motor…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. Harvey v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Hatt v. Burlington Coat FactorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. Spears v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dorchinsky v. Windsor InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  2. State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  3. Puente v. Progressive Northwestern Ins. Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. Rutter v. JanisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  5. Ludemann v. Specialty National InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API